Our In-House Personality Test
What is the in-house personality test?
MatcHub’s very own in-house personality test offers a comprehensive and efficient assessment tool that provides insight into the candidate’s personality, behaviours and work styles. This valuable information aims to empower both the employer and candidate to make well-informed hiring and application decisions, improving the potential for the best cultural fit.
How it Works
Through a detailed analysis of common interview questions, MatcHub’s in-house personality test is geared towards improving the recruitment process by giving employers valuable insight into a candidate’s personality even at the start of the process. With 51 questions spread over 3 sections, our personality test comprises a mix of Likert scale and scenario-based questions to allow for a holistic representation of how each candidate may react in various work situations.
Candidates may access a summary of their personality test results in their profile page. For employers, the candidates’ results will be conveniently reflected in each candidate’s job application. Through this assessment, we hope that both candidates and employers alike can gain a deeper understanding of workplace preferences, behaviors and motivations. Through the insights provided by our personality test, coupled with both hard skills and soft skills matching score though our AI algorithms, MatcHub seeks to provide the most informed employer-candidate match.



Why measure personality traits and work styles?
We strongly believe in a holistic approach when it comes to the recruitment process to allow not only the relevant hard skills to be accounted for, but also the soft skills like communication and conflict resolution to be taken into consideration to improve job matching outcomes.
Personality Traits We Measure
Openness to experience
People who are open to experiences tend to enjoy things that are new, different or exciting. Being extremely curious, they tend to embrace novel ideas and seek fresh experiences. They are adventurous, imaginative and open-minded. These people also often excel at making connections between seemingly unrelated concepts or ideas. This trait has also been shown to be linked to creativity, which may explain why high scorers of this trait tend to pursue creative projects and partake in creative hobbies.
On the other hand, those who score lower on Openness to experience may prefer routine tasks and tradition. They find solace in familiarity, which may lead them to avoid big career shifts in favour of stability and comfort.
Extraversion
Extroverted individuals are outgoing, enthusiastic and are often comfortable with being in the spotlight. They are full of energy and enjoy interacting with others, which allows them to quickly grasp the social and power dynamic of any situation. Extroverts are also typically assertive and optimistic and may use these strengths to facilitate their leadership abilities.
Those who score lower in Extraversion tend to value their alone time to recharge and may appear less exuberant or energetic to others. Since they require less external stimulation than extroverts, they tend to keep to themselves more often and work well independently.
Conscientiousness
People who are conscientious are organised, disciplined and diligent. They tend to be good at self-control and regulation. Dependable and responsible, they take ownership of their work and complete their assigned tasks ahead of the deadline. As planners, they schedule their daily tasks and try to stick to a timeline to achieve both long- and short-term goals. However, very high scorers can also tend to be perfectionists and workaholics, and should also learn to strike a work-life balance.
On the other hand, those who score lower in Conscientiousness may make decisions on the fly and can be seen as spontaneous or even impulsive. Their productivity may come in bursts of inspiration instead of following a strict schedule. They are also less fixated on deadlines and may prefer to look at the big picture instead of focusing on intricate details. They may be more suited to workspaces that rely on creativity and improvisation.
Flexibility
People who are flexible willingly embrace changes and are quick to adapt when thrown into a new or evolving situation. They are always on the lookout for alternative ways to approach a problem and are comfortable in changing their interaction style to suit different occasions. People who are flexible also enjoy working in an ever-changing environment.
On the contrary, those who score lower in Flexibility tend to lean towards consistency, predictability and stability. They may view constant changes as disruptive to their schedule and may thus prefer a more routine-based role in their workplace.
Proactiveness
People who are proactive take charge and make things happen. In a work environment, they ask questions and suggest ideas. They tend to anticipate and prepare for potential challenges. Instead of allowing circumstances to influence their actions, they would rather take action to dictate future outcomes. They see it as their responsibility to make improvements to the situation or project.
On the other hand, those who score lower in Proactiveness tend to be more reactive and would take action after something occurs. They may be quick at putting out fires and solving problems while readily following the instructions provided by their superiors.
Resilience
Resilience refers to staying calm and positive under pressure, and remaining in control despite high levels of stress. High scorers of this trait tend to view challenges as opportunities for learning and growth. They would not shy away from projects that push their boundaries. The ability to stay focused throughout periods of high pressure allows them to persevere when pursuing long-term goals.
Those who score lower in Resilience may find it more difficult to cope or adjust when challenges arise. They may feel overwhelmed and dwell on their mistakes for a longer time, which may lead to a preference for a work environment with less risk and pressure.
Willingness to learn
Those with a high Willingness to Learn have a strong desire to improve themselves, be it in their work competencies or personal development. They feel responsible for their growth and would reach out to colleagues to ask for feedback. They are receptive to criticism and would use the advice given to sharpen their skillset. They are dedicated to active learning and would often think of how to improve themselves after receiving feedback.
On the flip side, those who score lower in Willingness to Learn tend to be less open to criticism, preferring to trust and rely on their own knowledge and decisions. They may prefer to complete assigned tasks without requiring excessive supervision.
Entrepreneurial spirit
People who score high in Entrepreneurial Spirit are passionate and enthusiastic. They understand their interests deeply and are energised by challenges that might come their way. They take calculated risks to and are able to be decisive and work autonomously. They execute their unique plans and are optimistic about all possibilities and outcomes.
However, those who score lower in Entrepreneurial Spirit tend to veer away from risks in their work, preferring stability and predictability. They may appear more realistic, preferring to work in well-established organisations, with well-defined hierarchical structures and procedures.
Working Styles We Measure
Conflict resolution is how candidates find peaceful solutions to disagreements in the workplace. The 4 conflict resolution styles we measure, namely Avoiding, Competing, Accommodating and Collaborating, vary along 2 axes: assertiveness and cooperativeness.
Conflict Resolution
Conflict resolution is how candidates react to and deal with disagreements in the workplace. The 4 conflict resolution styles we measure, namely Avoiding, Competing, Accommodating and Collaborating, vary along 2 axes: assertiveness and cooperativeness.

Accommodating uses cooperativeness but not assertiveness. The candidate gives in to the wishes of the other party in a conflict. While the harmony of the team can be preserved, this conflict resolution style can lead to assertive members always taking the lead in conversations and decision-making.
Collaborating is when the candidate is assertive and cooperative. In a group setting, the candidate will facilitate an environment where each participant can share their views and co-create a solution where every party is satisfied with. Ideas and suggestions from the various parties are heard and considered to create the best compromise. Good relations are usually preserved when both sides choose to collaborate in a conflict.
Avoiding is when the candidate is neither assertive nor cooperative. The candidate withdraws from involvement in a conflict, and prefers to stay away from tension and confrontation at work. However, with avoidance, the issue at hand may remain unresolved.
Competing is when the candidate is assertive but uncooperative, perceiving an argument as a competition, where there will be a winner and a loser. Candidates tend to voice their opinions without hesitation and may even bring personal beliefs into the argument. While the candidate may remain firm, a competing conflict resolution style may prevent other less assertive voices from being accepted and heard.
Communication styles show how candidates are most comfortable expressing themselves and engaging with fellow colleagues.
Communication
Communication styles show how candidates are most comfortable expressing themselves and engaging with fellow colleagues. They may prefer verbal communication, where candidates enjoy connecting with people over calls or in real life. Candidates that prefer visual communication, on the other hand, express themselves best through graphical elements like illustrations and flowcharts. Last but not least, those preferring written communication enjoy expressing themselves through sending messages, memos and emails.
Preferring a fast-paced work environment means that candidates may enjoy high-performance expectations or constant activity at work. They work best under tight schedules and time crunches.
Preference for Fast-Paced Work Environment
Preferring a fast-paced work environment may mean that candidates tend to be adept at juggling multiple projects at once. They may work best under tight schedules and time crunches. On the other hand, those who prefer to take time to perfect their given assignments tend to be more deliberate thinkers, preferring to have a structured and more spaced-out plan for their work. However, many candidates perform at their optimum when there is a good balance of deadlines and down time.
Being suited for a dynamic environment means that candidates enjoy working in an ever-changing work environment and being involved in various tasks that push their comfort zone.
Preference for Routine vs. Dynamic Work Environment
A dynamic work environment means that the workplace tends to be ever-changing. In today’s context, this may mean having to alternate between different tasks, work with different people or work under flexible hours or locations. Employees may often find themselves in unforeseen circumstances where quick improvisation is required. A dynamic work environment also tends to prioritise completion of tasks rather than working for a fixed duration per day.
On the other hand, routine work environments tend to be more driven by structure and predictability. The jobscopes and assigned tasks tend to require similar skill sets. However, many candidates do not strictly prefer one or the other, instead falling along the spectrum in between. Thus, it is most ideal if candidates can strike a balance between having structure while also being exposed to a variety of assignments that challenge their situation-handling skills.
If candidates like to work in teams, they may be cooperative and versatile. They listen well and tend to identify the work required and complete it together with your teammates. As for independent workers, they are motivated to complete tasks on their own, thus requiring less hand-holding.
Preference for Working in Teams and Solo
If candidates like to work in teams, they may be cooperative and versatile. They listen well and tend to identify the work required and complete it together with their teammates. As for independent workers, they are motivated to complete tasks on their own, thus requiring less hand-holding. They manage their own deadlines well without the interference of others. Of course, candidates may be well-versed in both working in teams and independently. These individuals are able to adapt well to both work styles depending on the task at hand.
Develop your self-awareness while employers gain a deeper understanding of your workplace preferences and motivations with our self-assessment.
Your self-assessment results will be generated into an online report which will be used in your job applications on our platform!

Through the insight provided by our personality test, coupled with the hard skills matching provided though our AI, MatcHub seeks to provide the most informed employer-candidate match.